top of page

Fitness Freaks

Public·74 members
Ian Wilson
Ian Wilson

Wonder Woman 2017 Porn


Gal Gadot stars as WONDER WOMAN (2017) in the latest film based on DC comics.I went into seeing the film with high hopes. Gadot was a winning presence as Gisele in several FAST AND FURIOUS films, while leading man Chris Pine is a longtime favorite of mine. Added to that, the reviews -- with Leonard Maltin a notable exception -- were generally enthusiastic, even downright ecstatic.Having seen the film tonight, I can report that Gadot is phenomenally good, perfectly cast as Diana, princess of the Amazons, and Pine is his usual winning and attractive self. Unfortunately, I must also report that they're trapped in a dreary, disappointing movie.Diana (Gadot) has been raised by her mother, the Queen of the Amazons (Connie Nielsen), and trained in combat by her aunt (Robin Wright of THE PRINCESS BRIDE). They live on an island shielded from the outside world until one day a pilot, Steve Trevor (Pine) crash lands off the coast and Diana saves his life.Diana is fascinated by the first man she's ever seen. More importantly, she's moved by Steve's description of the horrors of World War I and decides to leave the island with him in order to try to end "the war to end all wars."That's a bare outline of the plot, and in actuality not a lot more happens than that -- which is part of the movie's problem. It's 141 interminable minutes, a poorly scripted (by Allan Heinberg) and darkly filmed slog through a whole lotta war scenes. Additionally, some of the movie is pretty derivative of the Marvel WWII film CAPTAIN AMERICA: THE FIRST AVENGER (2011), from the Howling Commandos type gang surrounding the hero to similar conclusions in airplanes. Both heroes are even named Steve. With relatively little knowledge of comic books I don't know whether all that material is original to both lines of comics, but cinematically speaking there was a definite "been there and seen it done better" feel to it.Gadot is simply wonderful, simultaneously conveying Diana's innocence and curiosity about the "outside world" with her fearlessness and determination to see justice done. She's physically stunning both in terms of her beauty and her power in the action scenes. She really sells that she's Wonder Woman. I'm glad I saw the film as far as being able to appreciate her performance, but she deserved better.There are brief flashes of movie magic thanks largely to Gadot and Pine, yet every time I thought the movie was about to take off and fly, it inevitably landed again with a thud.The DC films are known for being "dark" compared to the Marvel Cinematic Universe, and WONDER WOMAN was said to be an effort towards lightening up the DC movies. If this is light, I don't want to see dark!I was mentally comparing the film to Marvel's DOCTOR STRANGE (2016), inasmuch as Stephen Strange's own difficult journey on the way to saving the world could easily have gone very "DC" dark. But instead DOCTOR STRANGE is light on its feet, filled with wonder and even humor (the wifi password! the cape!). It also managed to clock in at a reasonable 115 minutes.The joy found in DOCTOR STRANGE is largely missing from WONDER WOMAN. There's some breathless magic when Wonder Woman initially goes into combat, but mostly it's fight scene after fight scene, punctuated with some ugly visuals (i.e., the mad scientist played by Elena Anaya) and not much humor; most of the latter comes from Steve trying to explain male-female relations to Diana. And to extend the DOCTOR STRANGE comparison, that film used CGI to effectively create a stunning world which unfolds in dizzying geometric designs, looking quite unlike other movies. WONDER WOMAN, on the other hand, looks a bit cheap, like an endless computer game.Perhaps most importantly, where was the editor? 20 minutes could have easily been excised, and a faster pace would have made it more enjoyable.A final thought on the script and accessibility: It's very important that with Marvel films a new fan can dive in anywhere, as I did, and quickly be up to speed and feel like an "insider." The WONDER WOMAN plotting felt murky to me as a DC newbie. For instance, I was completely confused by the opening and closing with a Diana lookalike working in the Lourve (huh?). If that was Wonder Woman and she was unchanged from a century before, how is it she grew up from childhood in the early scenes? Do goddesses like her stop aging at a certain point? Diana's expectation over what would result if she killed the God of War also could have been set up a little more clearly; her reactions were beautifully played yet I was taken aback that she was suddenly "done" with her desire to help humans. I honestly wonder if some critics felt intimidated about being hard on the first major female superhero film which was also directed by a woman, Patty Jenkins. (Jessie Maltin reported on Twitter that her father is receiving foul-mouthed and insulting hate Tweets due to his negative review.) If the delighted reactions were honest then I'm glad people enjoyed the film, but it does no one any favors saying the emperor (empress?) is wearing clothes. Gadot is wonderful, but she needs material which is worthy of her. And a good editor.WONDER WOMAN was filmed by Matthew Jensen. The supporting cast includes Danny Huston (yes, one of those Hustons!) as a villain.Parental Advisory: This film is rated PG-13. There's a high body count and a couple particularly disturbing moments, but it's not gory. A trailer is here. 2020 Update: Here is my review of the sequel, WONDER WOMAN 1984 (2020).




wonder woman 2017 porn


Download File: https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Ftinourl.com%2F2ugTvO&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AOvVaw3BX3zfOxIHgm6w7WntlgHB



Sadly, many of the films featuring women in this period are focused on the social engineering aspects of the "strong woman" trope. I've been disappointed time and time again, especially when it descends to the level of feminist victim porn.Note the poster for Batman V Superman, which had those two titular figures BEHIND Wonder Woman. (!?!) Historically, we've had scores of great women in great roles, leading great stories, but in a time when men also are given the sparest and most derivative plotlines, the sociopolitical agendas swirling around women are killing many otherwise potential-laced productions.Clayton o' Phantom Empires


Troy Michael Bordun recently taught a course on pornographic photography at Concordia University. His writings about porn and sexual representation can be found in Genre Trouble and Extreme Cinema: Film Theory at the Fringes of Contemporary Art Cinema (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017), and Porn Studies, Synoptique, Cine-Excess, and Studies in European Cinema, among others.


Anonymous was a woman, goes the credo. That Pseudonymous could not be a woman when the novel was pornographic suggests ignorance of the material. When the avant-garde novelist Iris Owens wrote smut for money as Harriet Daimler, did she not use her own hand? Author or no author, a woman is used to the man putting his name on her ideas, and some of these ideas are bound to be bad, obscene, desperate. Leaving the whole gaze to whoever owns the camera is not a better idea.


PORNBCN 4K For Women I am a woman with money, I spend the day traveling and I have no partner, so occasionally I take a break to treat myself, young, with little experience and with a big cock. Comedy porn 041b061a72


About

Welcome to the group! You can connect with other members, ge...

Members

Group Page: Groups_SingleGroup
bottom of page