A Meeting Of Two Journeys! !EXCLUSIVE!
Back at the Pokémon Center, Ash is thinking about the battle as Clemont arrives with drinks. Clemont vows to help Ash and Greninja understand their new power, proposing using science to assist with the cause, much to Ash's delight. As Alain continues his journey, the narrator states that though neither is aware of it, the first meeting of Ash and Alain has marked the beginning of the greatest crisis that will ever befall Kalos. As Team Flare is shown standing on the island with the mutated trees, Xerosic provides a report over radio to Lysandre, as a plane descends toward the island.
A Meeting of Two Journeys!
A user that has been migrated to Teams no longer uses a Skype for Business client except to join a meeting hosted in Skype for Business. All incoming chats and calls land in the user's Teams client, regardless of whether the sender uses Teams or Skype for Business. Any new meetings organized by the upgraded user will be scheduled as Teams meetings. If the user attempts to use the Skype for Business client, initiation of chats and calls is blocked1. However, the user can (and must) still use the Skype for Business client to join meetings they are invited to.
Select capabilities method (using one or more of the Skype for Business modes): The administrator manages the transition (from Skype for Business to Teams) of chat, calling, and meeting scheduling functionality for users in their organization. Each of these functions is available either in Skype for Business or Teams, but not both. Administrators use TeamsUpgradePolicy to control when to shift this functionality to Teams for their users. Users who are not yet in TeamsOnly mode continue to use Skype for Business for chat and calling, and the two sets of users can communicate via interop functionality. Administrators manage the transition by progressively migrating more users into TeamsOnly mode.
With the overlapping capabilities method, users can use both Teams and Skype for Business clients for chat, VoIP calling, and meetings. In this method, chat and VOIP calling in Teams is intra-organization focused, while Skype for Business enables chat and VOIP/PSTN calling with external organizations (if configured). Meetings can be scheduled and attended in both products.
Once you are ready to upgrade users to TeamsOnly mode, you can upgrade users individually or you can upgrade the entire tenant at once using the tenant-wide policy3. Once a user is upgraded to TeamsOnly mode, they receive all incoming chats and calls in Teams. (Note that migration of Skype for Business meetings to Teams meetings is only triggered when applying TeamsUpgradePolicy to individual users, not on a per tenant basis. See Meeting Migration for details.)
3 Note that migration of Skype for Business meetings to Teams meetings is only triggered when applying TeamsUpgradePolicy to individual users, not on a per tenant basis. See Meeting migration for details.
Administrators have options to enable certain Teams capabilities for users while keeping chat and calling capabilities in Skype for Business before users move to TeamsOnly experience. Administration can enable Teams collaboration capabilities or Teams meetings + collaboration capabilities.
Unlike the overlapping capabilities (Islands) method, in the select capabilities method, users using Skype for Business can communicate with users who are in TeamsOnly. Communication between a Skype for Business user and Teams user is known as interoperability or "interop". Interop communication is possible on a one-to-one basis for chats and calls between a user in Skype for Business and another user in Teams. In addition, invited users can always join either a Skype for Business or Teams meeting, however, they must use a client that corresponds to the type of meeting. For more information, see Meetings.
When the mode changes from Islands to SfbWithTeamsCollab, a user that has never used Teams will see no difference in how they use Skype for Business. However, should that user start to use Teams, they would only be exposed to functionality such as Teams & Channel and Files. Chat, calling and meeting scheduling would not be available in Teams, since the administrator has (for now) designated Skype for Business as the desired client for those functions.
When User A changes from Islands to one of the Skype for Business modes, the Teams client of any other user that communicates with User A needs to know that User A's mode changed so it can route the communication to the appropriate client for User A. For any users who have already established native Teams-to-Teams chats with User A, it can take up to 36 hours for these other users' Teams clients to be aware of the mode change from Islands to any Skype for Business mode. In contrast, changes for an existing user to TeamsOnly mode are discovered by other clients within 2 hours.When administrators are ready, they can shift chat, calling, and meeting scheduling for a given user to Teams all at once by updating the user's mode to TeamsOnly.
Jamie Stiehm '82 Good evening. I'm Jamie Stiehm, class of '82. We're delighted that you're here with us today to discuss democracy under fire, here at the capital where I am right now. I'm a journalist who covers congress. With me is Alex Friedfeld class of 2012. Alex is a researcher with the Anti-Defamation League in New York. He's an expert on extremist groups like Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and he has a fascinating story to tell about the mob storming the capital on January six, because he was tracking their online communications before, during, and after the attack. Meanwhile, I was here in the house chamber where I witnessed the siege. I remember it all too well. We're going to share and compare our journeys through that day. And in the second part of the hour, we happy to take your questions. So I wanna also thank the alumni council for hosting this event, and I am a member of the alumni council, and it's a wonderful way to connect with Swarthmore community at large. And I will ask Alex if I may take the first a vignette of the day. When I was walking to the capital grounds, is that all right?
Alex Friedfeld '12 Sure, so I work for the Anti-Defamation League, I'm in their center on extremism and essentially we track extremism wherever it goes. Far left to the far right. And basically the way we do that is we go where the extremists go on social media, and we are just flies on the wall. We watch them day in and day out to kind of get a sense of what they're planning, what's motivating them, and things that they might consider the real world, right? With the idea of being that we shine a light on these guys so that we can help inform media, communities, law enforcement, whoever the stakeholder may be, right? We arm them with the information about what these guys are talking about, what they're planning next to kind of keep tabs on them. And so in terms of like the Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys and kind of where we're at with digital extremists now. They've actually kind of gone in some different paths, right? So by and large after the insurrection, all of the major social media platforms, deep platform, discuss, right? Where they kick them off right off of Facebook, of Twitter, of Reddit, all of things of those natures. Some have been a little bit longer than others. Some of those bands have been longer and a little bit more thorough, but by and large, these guys were kind of removed from those spaces. And so as a result, we saw them navigate to other extremist platform or sorry, secondary and tertiary platforms, spaces that either popped up to kind of cater to this new audience, right? Or places that had been around for a while but for a variety of reasons, usually they're actually just pretty awful and like functionally, they just never took off. And so we saw people start to move towards those spaces, and that really impeded the ability of these extremist groups to get their message out and to recruit new people because there wasn't a coordinated plan of what did you do after you leave Facebook you know. Like they had to kind of figure out and they really kind of struggled to get a foothold anywhere. In terms though their actions, right? And I think that Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers are really fascinating in terms of the different paths that they've taken. So the Proud Boys over the last year have shifted their focus. They've tried to decentralize, right? So it used to have a much stronger national group but now they're actively encouraging local chapters to take matters into their own hands. And as part of that, they've encouraged kind of this move away from national politics, and instead focus on local politics, right? So go to your school board meetings, go to your town council meetings, harass the no medical professional in your neighborhood, right? And if you follow the news, you'll notice that a lot of stories about probably showing up in random towns and standing in the back of a council meeting with their mask on and just kind of four or five of them just glaring you know, and just sending that threatening message. In those instances where they don't actively grab the microphone themselves, right? So they have kind of continued despite 40 of them being charged in connection with interaction, they have continued to engage in street fights against the left, right in Portland in particular. We saw an escalation from sticks and clubs to paintball guns, to actual pistols being drawn, and people shots fired in anger, right? So they have continued to kind of seize this moment and use like the notoriety that's come along with the insurrection to further their cause. In contrast, the Oath Keepers you know have struggled this year for a variety of reasons, and I think part of it, you know, this is just speculation on my part. I think part of it is the kind of sway that Stewart Rhodes has over the organization. He founded the group. He's the president of the group for life. He has dictated basically every major strategic choice that they have made over the last 13 or so years. And he has always been in the cross hairs of law enforcement in regards to the insurrection, right? He from the very first indictments that came out I guess those three members of the Oath Keepers, Thomas Caldwell, Donovan Kroll, and Jessica Walkins, right? He was always person one in those papers, right? And he was acutely aware of the fact that he was likely gonna go at the prison at some point. He at one point gave a speech where he said, I'm gonna end up in prison. They're gonna throw me in jail. And so I think because of that he... You know because of that wariness, he kind of was a little bit quieter, right? So the Oath Keepers have not been particularly active in any organized way over the last year. Yes you see Oath Keepers shop on their own, but there hasn't been these kind of unified calls for action, which is kind of their trademark thing. Where they'll arrange a whole group of people to go to a protest or a rally, or even you know in the wake of natural disaster to go help out. They have been largely quiet and stymied because of the legal scrutiny. 041b061a72